HIV - Another Scam on US?

Source

Remember AIDS=Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome…this means the immune system is not able to fight off a wide variety of actual diseases. AIDS is NOT a disease and neither is HIV?

The video points out that the true cause of AIDS is any number of things, in this country it started out as a gay person and drug user's syndrome that caused many different diseases. The reason for it as stated in the film was the exposure to the retrovirus's of too many people, drug usage, stress; all of which breaks down the immune system. If a gay man has 50 sex partners in a year he is exposed to the retrovirus of those 50 plus the 50 each of them was exposed to plus the 50 each of them was exposed to ad infinitum. It also states that a variety of other illnesses stress the immune system to the point where this acquired immune deficiency syndrome occurs.

(PLEASE NOTE: I am only presenting information I learned in this video. I am making no judgments about gay people or drug users. You will need to do more research for yourself if this is personally impacting your life.)

Every country in the world measures and diagnoses HIV based on different criteria. You can be diagnosed as HIV positive in one country and as HIV negative in another. So if you find you are diagnosed as HIV positive in the USA then you can just move to Australia or some other country and be negative. Health problem solved right? There is something very wrong here…read on or scroll down and watch the video for yourself.

No one has ever seen the HIV virus! We only have artist's renditions of what they theorize the virus should look like. After all these years shouldn't we have found one of these viruses in somebody's blood? The doctors in this film say this is not normal procedure for declaring something a virus. You must be able to isolate a virus and see it in a microscope to identify it as a cause of a disease.

The test for HIV itself comes from the manufacturer with a warning…"This test should not be used for the diagnosis of HIV-1 infection and is intended for use only in individuals with documented HIV infection."

It appears as we are being scammed by the drug companies and the US Military. Yes the US Military …are you surprised? This video states that the head of the Center of Disease Control (CDC) and the other major medical agency (sorry I did not get the name of it…watch the video) involved with discovering HIV/AIDs and its continual classification is the US Military.

A doctor in the film is says, "Our theory is that AIDs can be treated and prevented by antioxidants and this has been proven by researchers from Stamford University where they have shown that AIDS patients including the T4 lymphocytes of AIDS patients are oxidized and that oxidation is directly related to the development of AIDS and conversely, if you give antioxidants to the AIDS patient, the progression of the disease is inhibited."

They have proven this and still they dole out the drugs …WHY? Follow the money!

AIDS is not a medical problem it is a social problem.

In the video they say, "In the 80s the AIDs epidemic was the result of the recreational drug epidemic in the US and Europe. It shifted considerably in the 90s and is a direct result of the anti-retroviral drugs themselves."

In Africa they have found it financially convenient to diagnose people HIV positive, because drug companies will pay for diagnosis and treatment, rather than with one of the many other diseases that cause AIDS.

That is enough from me. I am thoroughly disgusted. Watch the video.

Deconstructing The Myth Of AIDS (Gary Null)

We need to wake up to the bullshit we are being fed. Our governments, the medical community and the major networks are all doing a major snow job on us and we have to stop it. We get better information from the internet, independent bloggers and MySpace friends. Can you understand why I suggested a new system for governing ourselves in my blog International World Government.

A search on the internet for the producer of this video Gary Null turned up this web page refuting Gary and his claims:
http://www.actupny.org/reports/denialist_gary_null.html

There were many others too. I only present it as a counter point of view. I however have personally found that the medical community is often decietful and corrupt, especially when it come to money. Please take the information presented here and do your own research if this issue affects you or your loved ones directly. I believe that Christine Maggiorie's info in the comments below to be of great value.

Namasté
Michael Skowronski
Author of Unforgettable: A Love and Spiritual Growth Story

Help for HIV

http://www.helpforhiv.com/

Here are ten facts every person diagnosed as HIV-positive has a right to know (click on the underlined words for quick references)...

• 1. There is strong evidence that the HIV test you took is very often wrong. We have found over fifty different scientific studies listing seventy non-HIV conditions that can make the test produce false positive results. Depending on which test you took, they can actually be wrong as much as 90% of the time. So you might not be HIV-positive at all.

• 2. The HIV test you took was not a test for AIDS, or even a test for HIV. Despite what we've all been told, it was a simple test to find certain antibodies in your blood -- an "HIV-antibody" test. But viral antibodies alone do not indicate a current infection. In fact, in virtually every other antibody test, to be positive for the antibodies means that you had exposure to or a prior virus infection and are now immune from the disease that virus could cause. Antibody protection is the basis for the practice of vaccinations, like gaining immunity against the flu with a flu shot. There are no studies that show why we should think any differently about antibodies to HIV. A growing number of experts now believe that testing HIV-antibody-positive actually means that you have successfully created what your body needs to defeat any HIV infection.

• 3. The HIV test you took has never been "validated," as was normally done in the past. That means that there has never been a group of people who tested HIV-positive who were then proven to have active HIV (not just the antibodies) in their blood. Conversely, there has also never been a group who tested HIV-negative and were proven not to have active HIV in their blood. This lack of test validation raises serious questions about the validity of your positive diagnosis.

• 4. The proteins used in the HIV test kits have never been proven to be unique or specific for HIV. In fact, every one of the proteins used in the test has been found to be associated with conditions that have nothing to do with HIV -- and many of these proteins have nothing to do with illness of any kind. In other words, scientific evidence cannot prove that a positive HIV test means that you have HIV or AIDS or any other health problem.

  5. No HIV test, whether it uses blood, urine or saliva, has ever been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the specific intended purpose of diagnosing infection with HIV.

  Click to enlarge

  In fact, there is a printed insert that comes in every HIV test kit which contains a disclaimer that the test cannot diagnose actual infection with HIV. Most doctors giving the test and most people taking the test never see these disclaimers

• 6. Nineteen samples of the same blood were sent to nineteen different laboratories for a Western Blot test, and they all came back with different results. 525 samples of the same blood of an ELISA-Positive test were sent to 525 different laboratories for a Western Blot confirmation, and came back with very different results. One blood sample was sent to the same lab 44 times and came back with different results. This means that your tests results could have been different if they had been done in a different laboratory.

• 7. There is no established standard for determining the results of your test. In fact, there are at least ten different ways to interpret your HIV test, and each one of those can give a different result. It often depends on where you live in the world, whose standards are used to interpret your test, and what information you give about your life and health history. You might be positive according to one set of standards, but negative using another. Some people have gone from being HIV-positive to being HIV-negative just by moving to a different location, or by changing laboratories or testing sites, or giving different information about their potential "risk factors."

• 8. Many people believe that HIV viral load tests do what antibody tests cannot, by detecting the actual virus. But this is a false belief. According to the disclaimer statements on viral load tests, they are "not intended to be used as a screening test for HIV or to confirm HIV infection." This is because the viral load tests have some of the same problems as the HIV blood tests: they have never been validated, the "probes" and "primers" they use have never been proven to be unique or specific to HIV, they are not standardized from laboratory to laboratory, they produce a high rate of false positives, and more. In fact, most laboratories will not allow you to take an HIV viral load test unless you have already tested HIV-positive, because people who are HIV-negative have had high HIV viral load results.

  In addition, the most recent scientific study shows that viral load measurements failed in 90% of the cases in predicting the loss of CD4 cells, which HIV is supposed to destroy. In fact, viral load tests were only able to predict "progression to disease" in 4% to 6% of the HIV-Positives studied. This study proves that there must be "nonvirological mechanisms as the predominant cause of CD4 cell loss." In other words, HIV cannot be the cause of immune deficiency and therefore a viral load test is a totally useless indicator of whether someone will get AIDS. An analysis of this study in the same issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association concluded that viral load results alone should not be used to begin antiretroviral therapy (HAART).

• 9. A lot of emphasis is also placed on CD4 (or T-cell) counts to diagnose someone with AIDS. However, T-cell counts can fluctuate widely from day to day and hour to hour in even normal, healhy people. We've known since 1991 that "variance in CD4 from ...non-HIV related longitudinal fluctuations needs to be accounted for in analysis of the prognostic power of CD4 in HIV infection." And other studies have found perfectly healthy HIV-negative individuals with very low T-cell counts. And as recently as May 2007, from the Imperial College of London: "Our new interdisciplinary research has thrown serious doubt on one popular theory of how HIV affects these [CD4] cells."
• 10. And despite what you hear from the mass media, there is no scientific study that proves that HIV is transmitted through heterosexual intercourse. In fact, the opposite is true. The longest and largest study of its kind (called the Padian study) found no transmission of HIV in any of the study couples, regardless of whether they were using condoms or not; and the most recent study from the British Medical Journal found no evidence that abstinence would prevent HIV infection.

BUT THAT'S NOT ALL !

Continued...